close
 2012 ELECTIONS: US shows Ma preference: experts

 

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/01/08/2003522722 (20120108)

 

NOT HIGHLY VALUED:Former NSC official Parris Chang says the AIT’s decision to brief the current NSC chief on US policy shows they finally take him seriously

 

By Shih Hsiu-chuan  /  Staff Reporter

 The release of the briefing provided by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) to the nation’s security-related officials on the latest US Defense Strategic Guidance was another sign of US preference in the coming presidential election, experts on US-Taiwan relations said yesterday.

In an apparent departure from its usual low-key style, the National Security Council (NSC), the organ established under the Presidential Office to advise the president on issues related to national security, on Friday issued a statement regarding the briefing.

Released to the press via the Presidential Office, it said that AIT officials explained at length the major shift in the US’ strategic military objectives outlined in the guidance and expressed the US’ commitment to security in the Asia-Pacific region as well as a desire to cooperate with its allies, including Taiwan.

The NSC said in the statement that the US side, at the meeting, had described the briefing “as an exemplification of a very high degree of importance it has attached to our government.”

That raised concerns again that the US favors President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is running for re-election, over Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), an issue that has continued in the same vein since the secret leak” to the Financial Times that the US mistrusts Tsai in her handling of cross-strait relations.

When reached for comment on the NSCs publicizing this kind of meeting, Lin Chong-Pin (林中斌), a professor at Tamkang University, said the NSC, which serves as an advisory body to the president, normally avoids the media spotlight.

An NSC member from 2002 to 2003, during the previous DPP government, Lin said that public statements of the kind made by the NSC are usually made by other ministries.

It is a “worldwide practice” that diplomats brief officials in their host governments on their countries’ major policies, Lin said, adding that communication or exchange of ideas between the AIT and Taiwanese officials, including national security council officials, “happens on and off.”

Lin said he was not sure if the NSC had obtained the AIT’s consent before releasing the statement, but added that it would backfire “if we [Taiwan] do something unilaterally like this without AIT approval.”

In this case, if the AIT refrains from protesting, taking action to clarify the NSC statement or distancing itself from the announcement, “that implies that the AIT has given prior approval” and “that the US State Department ... representing the US government has known about it,” Lin said.

If that is the case, Lin said, it would imply “a gesture by Washington” that “it skillfully took a preference on the coming presidential election in Taiwan regarding the two sides.”

I won’t say it was an outright expression of anything, but it was indirectly, or in a more subtle manner, Washington did make a gesture,” Lin said.

Yen Chen-shen (嚴震生), a research fellow at the Institution of International Relations of National Chengchi University, agreed.

The NSC statement, Taiwan’s nomination as a candidate for US visa-free status, the spate of visits by high-ranking US officials and many other incidents before that were “all gestures that were trying to kind of reinforce the impression that the US continues to support Taiwan and the current government’s non-confrontational policy [toward China],” he said.

Over the years, since National Security Council Secretary-General Hu Wei-chen (胡為真) succeeded former secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起) in February 2010, the council has tried to stay off the press radar, Yen said.

The NSC usually does not issue press releases, but this time they did. The NSC is trying to show that Ma is the preferred candidate for the US,” Yen said.

Yen said that it could be the NSC’s idea to make the briefing public in the form of a news release after communicating with the AIT and that “the US did not object.”

The US would like to trust someone they have dealt with for four years and has not created any problems. For the US, Tsai might look to be very rational, but you don’t know what will happen if she is elected. That’s the [US’] preference,” he said.

Former National Security Council deputy secretary-general Parris Chang (張旭成), who served under the DPP administration from 2004 to 2006, said the council was politically motivated to issue the news to show to our people that the US sides with Ma in this election.”

Disagreeing with the political overtones that the NSC has attached to the AIT briefing, Chang said that the event was a “regular communication” that takes place between the AIT and the NSC from time to time.

The briefing was quite a normal thing and was not supposed to be something to be bragged about. If the current government exacerbates the importance of the briefing, it’s something else,” Chang said.

Chang said he was glad to know that the AIT provided the briefing to the NSC because he had known that the US did not take Hu and the NSC seriously.

[Hu] had tried several times to visit the US, but he was told that there was nothing to talk about. That was the information I got about a year or so ago,” he said.

The US has expected its allies in the region to do more to share the burden on specific issues, such as controversies surrounding the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) and the South China Sea.

It’s good that the US now takes Taiwan seriously, but the problem is whether the Ma administration will continue to tilt towards China or to stand with the community of democracy, not the communists like China,” Chang said.

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()