"China is Not an Enemy" 

Washington Post July 3, 2019

Accessed July 4, 2019

"China is Not an Enemy" Washington Post July 3, 2019

●簽名的百位學者幾乎是美國研究中國的學者和擔任中國政策的文武官員和企業界顧問的「人物大全」名人冊。

The list of signatures at the end of the seven-point petitions is almost "Who is who" of scholars, government officials (both foreign service and defense department officers), and business world consultants in the U.S.

●在下數十年接觸的美方中國問題所有關鍵人物幾乎都在內。官員包括如共和黨的Douglas Paal 民主黨的Richard Bush。軍方的Dennis Blasko, 商界的Ian Bremmer

●明顯不在內的有友台的Kurt Campbell 他在 20183月的Foreign Affairs發起質疑數十年華府已交往為主的中國政策的大辯論。他的博士似乎屬國際關係而非中國研究。還有長年駐北京的洛杉磯時報名記者Jim Mann。當然還有現在為川普總統依重的Michael Pillsbury白邦瑞。三位在下都認識,後二者可稱是好友。

 

-- Knowledgeable China experts in the U.S. do not support the zero-sum China policy under president Trump.

-- The popular notion in the U.S. that both Republican and Democratic parties are joined by China-bashing may not be blanketedly accurate.

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()

一項新聞 兩篇報導

《自由時報》2019726A8

《聯合報》2019726A14

Accessed July 26, 2019

一項新聞 兩種報導

 

一項新聞,兩家媒體,報導內容,一疏一密。時代推進,特質轉換,歷史寡情,悲嘆何用?

 

032.jpg

033.jpg

034.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

美情報總監下台 川普鐵粉接班

《聯合報》2019730A12

Accessed July 30, 2019

兩點觀察 Two observations

●川普團隊的外交政策自我扞格。

川普手下的職業軍人和情報官比他自己更務實的觀察國際局勢。例如,他們認為北韓不會自毀核子武器,而他認為北韓將要自毀核子武器。

另外一例,由白邦瑞提出。川普手下很多人認為中國是邪惡的敵人,而川普不認為如此,否則她孫女為何三歲就學中文唱中國歌?當選總統前,川普一心一意要去中國賺大錢。白邦瑞說,川普只是不想看到中國超越美國成世界首強。

The Trump team has exhibited its cognitive dissonance in foreign policy with the professional soldiers and intelligence officers being the more realistic and even more hawkish on one side and the President himself being the less realistic and sometimes the less hawkish on the other side.

For example, the professionals have observed that North Korea will not abandon its nuclear weapons while Trump has indicated that North Korea will do so.

Dr. Michael Pillsbury indicated on July 25 that President Trump did not view China as enemy as many of advisors did. Pillsbury revealed that Trump just was concerned that China might replace the U.S. as the world's leader.

●台灣兩報國際新聞表現又再易位。https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2568702356494498&id=100000642779020

兩家媒體,一項新聞,內容對比,一疏一密。品質翻轉,不過四日。

20190730 美情報總監下台 川普鐵粉接班.jpg

20190730 眼中釘下月離職 川普擇定新情報首長.jpg

20190728 阻陸崛起 美不惜退出貿易談判.jpg

 

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Trump Struggles to Achieve 3 Percent Economic Goal as Growth Slows

Washington Post July 26, 2019

Accessed July 28, 2019

美國第二季度GDP 成長2.1%, 由第一季度3.1%下降。這是美國商務部美國時間週五7/26公佈的。

-- 川普要維持2019成長3%現在不確定了。

-- 他原先怪歐巴馬是唯一未達成3%的總統。現在他語氣緩和下來。

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/07/26/trump-promised-percent-or-better-economy-so-far-its-not-happening/

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

The Coming Economic CrashAnd How to Stop It

Elizabeth Warren

Accessed July 24, 2019

2008金融危機之前,美國現任參議員華倫當時是哈佛大學教授, 曾在 2003, 2004, 2005 警告經濟危機將要到來。

 

2019.7.22她發表文章警告:經濟衰退將要在2020年底或2021年到來。

 

目前不利的跡象有三

-- 家庭債務上升

-- 公司債務上升

-- 製造業衰退

 

最近訪問300位企業經濟家,3/4認為經濟衰退將於2021年底前到來,1/2認為2020年底前到來。

 

已經有人批評她如此說是為了減低川普的聲勢,增加民主黨挑戰川普的力度。但她之前預言2008金融危機讓人不得不聽她現在的警告及建議。

 

至少這是個勇敢的賭博。到明年年底,若經濟仍然旺盛 ,她的選舉將垮的很慘; 若經濟果如她所說,她聲勢將大增。

 

The Coming Economic Crash — And How to Stop It

Jul 22, 2019

By Elizabeth Warren

https://medium.com/@teamwarren/the-coming-economic-crash-and-how-to-stop-it-355703da148b

I warned about an economic crash years before the 2008 crisis, but the people in power wouldn’t listen. Now I’m seeing serious warning signs in the economy again — and I’m calling on regulators and Congress to act before another crisis costs America’s families their homes, jobs, and savings.

I’ve spent most of my career getting to the bottom of what’s happening to working families in America. And when I saw the seeds of the 2008 crisis growing, I rang the alarm as loud as I could.

In 2003, I called out subprime lenders for tricking unsuspecting families — especially families of color — into refinancing into overpriced subprime mortgages. In 2004 and 2005, I warned that families were getting deeper into debt and hanging on only by borrowing against their homes, which put them in a vulnerable position if costs rose or a family member lost a job. In2006, I flagged that foreclosure rates were starting to go up, but that the mortgage lenders were still churning out loans because they had passed on the risk of defaults to investors in the form of mortgage-backed securities. Those trends — shady subprime lending, rising household debt, a mortgage market where lenders didn’t bear the risk of their loans — set the stage for the 2008 crisis.

But the people with the power to stop the crisis didn’t listen — not enough of them anyway. Not the banks, not Alan Greenspan or other federal regulators, not Congress. And when the crisis hit in 2008, working families lost it all while the big banks that broke the economy got a fat taxpayer bailout.

When I look at the economy today, I see a lot to worry about again. I see a manufacturing sector in recession. I see a precarious economy that is built on debt — both household debt and corporate debt — and that is vulnerable to shocks. And I see a number of serious shocks on the horizon that could cause our economy’s shaky foundation to crumble.

Our Precarious Economy

Household debt. A generation of stagnant wages and rising costs for basics like housing, child care, and education have forced American families to take on more debt than ever before. The student debt load has “more than doubled since the financial crisis. American credit card debt matches its 2008 peak. Auto loan debt is the highest it has ever been since we started tracking it nearly 20 years ago, and a record 7 million Americans are behind on their auto loans — many of which have similar abusive characteristics as pre-crash subprime mortgages. 71 million American adults — more than 30% of the adults in the country — already have debts in collection. Families may be able to afford these debt payments now, but an increase in interest rates or a slowdown in income could plunge families over a cliff.

Corporate debt. Corporations are also deeply in debt. Leveraged lending — lending to companies that are already seriously in debt — has jumped by40% since Trump took office, spreading “systemic risk” throughout our financial system. These high-risk loans now make up a quarter of all American business loans, and they look a lot like the pre-2008 subprime mortgages: poorly-underwritten loans with minimal protections that are then packaged and sold to investors. I’ve warned regulators about my concerns — which experts share — but their tepid response shows they haven’t learned the lessons of the last crisis.

Manufacturing recession. Despite Trump’s promises of a manufacturing “renaissance,” the country is now in a manufacturing recession. The Federal Reserve just reported that the manufacturing sector had a second straight quarter of decline, falling below Wall Street’s expectations. And for the first time ever, the average hourly wage for manufacturing workers has dropped below the national average.

The country’s economic foundation is fragile. A single shock could bring it all down. And the Trump Administration’s reckless behavior is increasing the odds of just such a shock.

The administration may breach the debt ceiling in September, leading to economic turmoil that top economists say would be “more catastrophic” than the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. Trump’s trade war with China threatens American manufacturing and has already hurt American companies that investors think of as “industry bellwethers,” while feedingan all-time economic slowdown in China that could have dramatic ripple effects on the American economy. And Trump is goading the U.K. toward a no-deal Brexit, which even his own administration acknowledges would have “immediate and significant spillover effects” to our economy.

The financial markets agree that there is a serious risk of downturn in the near future. The U.S. Treasury yield curve — a barometer for market confidence — normally slopes upwards because investors demand higher yields for bonds with longer maturities. But this March, it inverted for the first time since 2007, signaling that investors are so worried that things are going to get worse that they’d rather lock in lower rates for the future today than risk long-term rates going even lower. The curve has inverted before each and every recession in the past half century — with only one false signal.

And experts agree. In a recent survey of nearly 300 business economists, three-quarters expect a recession by the end of 2021 — with more than half thinking it’ll come by the end of 2020.

Stopping the Next Downturn

The good news is that we have the chance to head off a crisis — just like we had a chance to head off the 2008 crisis — if we take bold action now to address the underlying problems in the economy:

Reduce household debt: To put our economy — and our families — on firmer ground, it is essential to reduce household debt both by raising people’s wages and by bringing down their costs. That is the heart of my economic agenda. We can raise incomes by increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour, strengthening unions, ensuring that women of color get the wages they deserve, and empowering workers to elect at least 40% of board members at big American corporations. We can reduce costs and slash household debt by cancelling up to $50,000 in student loan debt for 95% of people who have it, bringing down the cost of rent, providing universal affordable child care and early education for all our kids ages 0–5, and making tuition free at every public technical school, two-year college, and four-year college.

Monitor and reduce leveraged corporate lending: In response to the 2008 crisis, Congress created the Financial Stability Oversight Council — made up of the heads of the financial regulatory agencies — to monitor risks that cut across different markets. The risks of leveraged lending are exactly the kind of thing FSOC is supposed to monitor, but the Trump-era FSOC is falling down on the job. It should meet specifically to discuss these risks and announce a plan for addressing them. Federal regulators should also enforce leveraged lending guidance that is intended to stop banks from issuing these risky loans in the first place.

Strengthen manufacturing: We need policies that reverse the manufacturing job losses of the past twenty years by investing in manufacturing instead of undercutting it. My Green Manufacturing Planwill mobilize our industrial base by making a $2 trillion investment in American green research, manufacturing, and exporting over the next decade. This will create more than a million high-quality jobs and help address the existential threat of climate change.

Limit potential shocks to the economy: With a vulnerable economy, we should be reducing the odds of potential shocks that could push us into a downturn. The Trump Administration should stop pushing for a no-deal Brexit and start planning for how to insulate the American economy if that occurs. It should replace the trade-war-by-tweet with China with a coherent strategy — working with our allies — to respond to China’s trade tactics. We need to invest in strengthening critical American industries, instead of undercutting American companies. And we should take the prospect of breaching the debt ceiling off the table forever by either eliminating it or by automatically raising the ceiling to accommodate spending and revenue decisions authorized by Congress.

Warning lights are flashing. Whether it’s this year or next year, the odds of another economic downturn are high — and growing. Congress and regulators should act immediately to tamp down these threats before it’s too late.

027.jpg

028.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Your Body Is an Illusion

Bruce Lipton

Accessed July 22, 2019

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uCIgxYuNGu0

以下十分鐘的演說者是研究細胞生物學的Bruce Lipton博士。暢銷書The Biology of Belief (信仰生物學)的作者。他以科學證明了我們的心念可以控制我們身體的功能。他自己也成功的用心念改進自己的健康。

-- 我們每個人由50兆細胞組成。每個細胞裡面載負電,外面載正電。每個細胞是個電池。帶1.4volt電量。全身帶70volt

我們不是單一的個體,而是電磁波,和振動。

-- 我們每個人是個小電台。不斷的,我們的正能量、負能量向外發放。正能量吸引其他正能量,負能量吸引其他負能量。

-- 我們天生有能力探測到外面的危險,但不用慢慢退化了。

-- 勿低估我們信仰的強大的潛力。美國南部浸信會基本教義信仰者在聚會時可以進入信仰的狀態,用響尾蛇咬,都沒事。甚至喝響尾蛇毒液也沒事。

-- 我們有時想到10年未見的朋友,電話鈴嚮,接起話筒,竟然就是他!

-- 所有的療癒有1/3是由於心念的效果,不是藥物。所謂the placebo effect。同樣的,沒病的人若相信自己有癌症,身體就像被注射化療般。這叫做nocebo effect

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

夫人將軍 (Madame General)

Accessed July 22, 2019

夫人將軍 (Madame General)
《經濟學人》 2019.7.6 27&28
美軍40步兵師成立於1917,歷經百戰,過去31位彪悍師長的傳承至今年629日交給慧秀堅毅的蘿拉耶葛少將。
今年54歲的夫人將軍曾任戰地黑鷹駕駛是美國史上第一位女師長。
少將通常指揮一萬士兵。耶葛少將統御4個四千多人的戰鬥旅,總數超過一萬六。
她出身大學預備軍官,1980年代從軍時,女人不准開坦克車、參加任何戰鬥任務。
●2000年之前,加拿大是唯一准許女人參加戰鬥單位的北約國家。美國要等到2013年歐巴馬總統才批准跟進。
●1973年美軍只有4.2% 女性;2017年比例增加至18.4%
●1997年蘭德公司調查結果是:女性進入軍隊並沒有降低戰備、團結、和士氣。

林中斌 試摘譯 2019.7.22
敬請賜教

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

首席指揮家 (The Conductor/De Dirigent)

Accessed July 22, 2019

首席指揮家 (英文The Conductor/荷蘭文De Dirigent)

佳片推薦(真人真事改編)

●動人的故事,感人的情節。荷蘭女性編劇兼導演(Maria Peters)細膩的手法 (包括請變性的帥哥演員飾慈善的女扮男裝低音大提琴手)

●動人:出生不高、但有決心也有天分的女子,如何衝破社會偏見的籓籬,出人頭地。

感人:藏在社會負面表象下,正面力量不聲不響的存在,像天使般的對追求理想、有心奮鬥的人伸出不為人知的援手。

Antonia Brico (1902 Rotterdam -- 1989 Denver)是荷蘭不知名音樂家與其母之私生女,也是首位歐美成功的女性指揮家。1908養父母移民美國,她成長於舊金山,後赴歐學指揮。

19302月,當時時她28歲,指揮柏林愛樂交響樂團,備受好評。之後她轉戰歐陸各大交響樂團,再赴美指揮舊金山交響樂團。1934年成立女性交響樂團任指揮,後於1939以她性改名為Brico Symphony Orchestra

●故事的大框架根據事實。編劇為了引人入勝、提升心靈的效果的確潤飾了許多情節。應該值得原諒。

林中斌 2019.7.22

016.jpg

017.jpg

018.jpg

019.jpg

020.jpg

021.jpg

022.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

"舞姬"(La Bayadere)

Accessed August 2, 2019

"舞姬"(La Bayadere)芭蕾。必看!!!

聖彼得堡馬林斯基舞團(Mariinsky Ballet, also known as Kirov Ballet, which was originally the Imperial Russian Ballet) 最早傑作。

 

010.jpg

The leading male dancer of the Mariinsky Ballet since 2015, Kimin Kim is a superb one from Korea shown in blue during the after-performance courtesy session on August 2, 2019 in Taipei.

 

011.jpg

012.jpg

013.jpg

014.jpg

015.jpg

Marius Pepita (1818 - 1910),called the "father of modern ballet", was a ballet dancer born in Marseilles. He moved to Russia in his twenties and achieved fame for being the chief choreographer of St. Petersburg's ballet performance at the end of the 19th and the very beginning of the 20th century. The ballet LA Bayadère is one of his most celebrated creations.

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

22強國譴責中國 促關新疆集中營

《自由時報》2019712A9版

Accessed July 14, 2019

22強國譴責中國 促關新疆集中營

《自由時報》2019712A9

712日新聞有3特點:

-- 是重要事件,引發後續對立事件(713日,37國聯合發表相反看法的聯合信,亦要求聯合國納入記錄)

-- 此重要事件為自由時報712日紙本報導,其他台灣大報紙本似乎忽略。

-- 自由時報之標題不無反中挺美之語氣,但內容7段中兩段似乎相反。其一轉載挺中環球時報申訴要點。其二報導先前譴責中國的土耳其總統最近挺中言論。

 

009.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()