林中斌「債務陷阱」的真相

《聯合報》2019313A15

accessed March 25, 2019

 

以下是聯合報 2019313日名人堂的拙文。
但是1,100字的限制下,尚有未納入的重點,簡述如下:
斯里蘭卡201712月因無法還債,把漢班托港移交中國經營九十九年。許多已發展/工業化的國家稱此為中國的「新殖民主義」。20185月,斯里蘭卡又欠美金廿億,而它GDP只有美金五十億。已發展/工業化的國家無人伸援手。只有中國願意,他又向中國借十億。其實斯里蘭卡所欠外債中也有日本的貸款。 (請見所貼圖2及圖3)
資料來源: Kari Lindberg & Tripti Lahiri,
'From Asia to Africa, China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” was under siege in 2018' Quartz December 28, 2018

https://qz.com/1497584/how-chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy-came-under-siege-in-2018/?fbclid=IwAR3mbapWBaQtcqEga2X8_Jg7MsC0jOP5sFWuow1f5WTwg3msUHZC11tDArw

accessed March 12, 2019

中國在幫助埃及建造新首都「新開羅」。 負責計畫的Gen. Ahmed Zaki Abdeen將軍批評美國不願意投資埃及。他說:「不要跟我們講人權。...來跟我們做生意。中國人來啦。他們尋找多贏的機會。歡迎中國人。」 (請見所貼圖4及圖5)
資料來源:Peter S. Goodman and Jane Perlez,
"China Rules
They didn’t like the West’s
playbook. So they wrote their own.
PART 3
Money and Muscle Pave
China’s Way to Global Power"
New York Times Nov. 25, 2018

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/25/world/asia/china-world-power.html?fbclid=IwAR0bJeAMn9N7nImw1ejTcoOLcgXXH89uyhemgP2xN2n23cf8y0Tj6xZMPAo

「債務陷阱外交」這個詞彙從來沒有周詳的解釋過,而把它用在非洲是相當勉強的。非洲對中國所負的債比起非洲整體的外債並不是特別了不起。請參考下圖 (只有每個柱子頂端藍色部分才是欠中國的債。)
(請見所貼圖6及圖7)
資料來源: W. Gyude Moore, “The language of “debt-trap diplomacy” reflects Western anxieties, not African realities” Quartz September 17, 2018 https://qz.com/1391770/the-anxious-chorus-around-chinese-debt-trap-diplomacy-doesnt-reflect-african-realities/?fbclid=IwAR0vaypGqKBlBP89_7zQa92RUmNU_x0LbrnWn2zfG5xBha7gRk6Yn8MMexQ

accessed March 5, 2019

《債務陷阱》的真相
聯合報 2019313
林中斌
名人堂稿件
日期:2019308 本文字數:1100 目標字數:1100

一七年一月,印度戰略學者Brahma Chellaney撰文說 中國一帶一路是以巨債設陷阱控制位居戰略要點的國家
那年十二月,斯里蘭卡,欠北京貸款無法償還,把漢班托港移交中國經營九十九年。全球譁然,「債務陷阱」一炮而紅。
一九年一月,《南華早報》指出:東南亞一七年原有卅三國接受中國投資基礎建設,一年後只剩十二國。其它已紛紛退出,包括馬來西亞取消兩百億美金的「東岸鐵路計畫」。
北京的「一帶一路」看來各處碰壁。是嗎?且看另一面。
成功案例不提。一八年三月四日,美國華府Center for Global Development發表報告:全球接受北京投資建設的六十八國中,廿三國可能有債務風險,其中八國最為嚴重,包括吉布提等。於是,這瀕臨破產的八國廣被轉述。然而,一年後的今天,八國尚未破產。而其他可能成功的四十五國佔三分之二卻乏人報導。例如,八年破產的希臘,經中國投入九十億美元投資基建,一四年後GDP成長已由負轉正,中國經營的Piraeus港吞吐量從一年至一八年已由全球第九十三升為第三十八。其它有中國投資建設經營成功的港口的國家包括以色列、荷蘭、和西班牙。
美國反制乏力。一八年三月五日,美國國務卿Tillerson前往非洲前公開警告非洲國家接受中國投資建設的風險,並強調接受美國投資的安全。不料,兩天後他便被曾經罵非洲國家是「糞坑」的川普總統免職。奈及利亞教授Pat Utomi告訴路透社說:「Tillerson的警告於是毫無作用。」十月,川普撥六百億美元強化本來他要解散的援助發展中國家機構USDFC。美國反制中國嫌遲,其對發展中國家前侷後恭的態度為其長遠的成效鋪上陰影。
非洲另類心聲。一七年中國解放軍在吉布提設立第一個海外基地。一八年八月卅一日路透社訪問吉布提港口及自由貿易區的管理處主席Aboubakar Omar Hadi。為了發展貨櫃港,他找了七家西方銀行,提供二點六八億美元貸款,利息九趴,九年歸還。而中國提供六點二億美元貸款,利息二點八五趴,廿年歸還,附帶七年緩衝期。他感嘆說:「中國慷慨多了。美國在哪?歐洲在哪?我們等他們來投資。為何他們不顧非洲,卻交給中國?他們現在出局了,只能怪自己。」
一八年九月十七日,利比里亞前公共建設部部長W. Gyude Moore在美國電子報Quartz指出,西方長年認為非洲的基礎建設「不經濟也不必要」,其實今日非洲大量債務負擔裡,中國佔很少部分,例如在Sub-Sahara地區,一三年佔八點九趴,一五年佔四點八趴。
北京設法補救。Moore部長還說:「強調斯里蘭卡漢班托港的惡例忽略了過去十五年北京對八十四個借貸國調整融資構架甚至免除償還的善例,包括北京對伊索皮亞三次調整,還有對委內瑞拉毫無所取。」去年九月北京在中非合作論壇上再度提供六百億美元的援助金額,一如一五年論壇,不同的是免利息的五十億撥款升為三百億美元。同時,北京已向馬來西牙提議「東岸鐵路計畫」成本減半,雙目前方仍在協商。

作者為前華府喬治大學外交學院講座教授,曾任國防部副部長

圖一

1.jpg

圖二↓

2.jpg

圖三↓

3.jpg

圖四↓

4.jpg

圖五↓

5.jpg

圖六↓

6.jpg

圖七↓

7.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

倫敦初春

February 28, 2019

 accessed March 11, 2019

相簿連結:http://chongpinlin.pixnet.net/album/set/8351417-%e5%80%ab%e6%95%a6%e5%88%9d%e6%98%a5-london-in-spring-like-winter

2.jpg

Lincoln's Fields Park

4.jpg

5.jpg

7.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Despite debt woes, Africa still sees China as best bet for financing

accessed March 11, 2019

路透社2018831日報導:
吉布提港的官員Aoubakar Omar Hadi, chairman of the Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority, 感嘆道:
"許多國家雖然對中國負債已重仍然找北京幫忙。因為向中國借錢遠比西方銀行條件優厚。

"But many countries, even those heavily indebted to China, still say Beijing offers far better terms than Western banks, and that European nations and the United States fail to match its generosity.
尤其你找跨國金融機構,要花很長的時間。"⋯⋯

Reuters 全文聯結:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-africa/despite-debt-woes-africa-still-sees-china-as-best-bet-for-financing-idUSKCN1LF2RM?fbclid=IwAR2zloz68yTUFvrrU4pmbLh36nX8_CHmBeMOpDE97U5ldrGU0d_T1cYRzao

95864826-951f-11e2-a151-00144feabdc0.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

電影推薦:為副不仁幸福綠皮書

真寵

accessed March 11, 2019

--."Vice"(此自有兩意:副手,罪惡)
電影"為副不仁
特佳影片,深度研究,節奏緊湊,曝露不少,隱含更多。演技精堪!!
-- 一天看獲獎三片,上片最為推薦。其他為

--The Green Book 幸福綠皮書
-- Favourite 真寵
-- 三片皆有事實背景。
-- "Favourite "英國巴洛克音樂極為精緻之外,丘吉爾祖先英國歷史最偉大名將Duke of Marborough的事業轉點生動烘托。
-- 他從1702-1711連續十戰十勝,但反遭國內政治人物控訴,自我流放至歐陸。勿怪後世孫丘吉爾寫書為之平反,被Foreign Affairs 認為是廿世紀最重要名著之一:
Marlborough: His Life and Times.

為副不仁電影海報

真寵電影海報

幸福綠皮書電影海報

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Manvar Camp & Jodhpur, Rajasthan,

India February 6 & 7, 2019

accessed March 11, 2019

相簿聯結:http://chongpinlin.pixnet.net/album/set/8351363-manvar-camp-%26-jodhpur%2c-rajasthan%2c-india

22.jpg

 

Lake by the tomb of a Sufi saint

27.jpg

Mehrangarh castle/palace

1.jpg

2.jpg

Lake by the tomb of a Sufi saint

3ed.jpg

4.jpg

Panaramic view from above the Mehrangarh castle/palace

7.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

為何包括華人的南亞人雖瘦卻易得心臟病並猝死?

accessed March 11, 2019


-- 甚至吃素、運動、不抽煙、血壓和膽固醇指數正常的南亞人也會心臟病突發?
-- 因為他們的脂肪傾向存於肝臟、腹腔、肌肉而非皮下。
-- 他們蔬菜、水果、堅果的攝取量不夠。
-- 在美國的南亞人習慣吃家鄉菜與食物的,比也吃西方食物的,心臟病比例高。
林中斌試摘譯 2019.3.4

New York Times 全文聯結:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/well/live/why-do-south-asians-have-such-high-rates-of-heart-disease.html

53020173_2332341080130628_5680127509186740224_o.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

沙烏地王儲下令全國學習中文

accessed March 11, 2019

沙烏地王儲二月從北京回國後,下令全國學校學中文(根據Saudi Gazette 2019222日報導)
沙烏地可能是全球華文國家以外,唯一訂中文為第二外語之國。(有待查證)
沙烏地因受西方批評人權,已把外交重心移向向亞洲(紐約時報2019.2.22報導)
王儲二月底訪問巴基斯坦,答應投資$20 billion/美元200億於礦業、農業及其他基本建設。
王儲訪問印度,將賣更多石油。
王儲訪北京於去年1130G20宣告支持一帶一路之後再
見習近平,積極安排中國協助沙烏地 Vision 2030計畫。
全球57個伊斯蘭國家的2/3基礎建設尚未開發。這正是北京一帶一路發展的沃土。來源:中阿關係資深學者熊高賢教授2019.3.2面告。
進一步觀察: A.中國是唯一交好沙烏地、伊朗、以色列的
大國。北京有潛力成為未來斡旋中東複雜
關係的力量。
B. 沙烏地與伊朗兩大金主可能成為中國一
帶一路計畫的經濟助力(熊教授)。巴基
斯坦被認為債務陷阱高風險國,已得 
到沙烏地援助而風險舒緩。
林中斌 整理 敬請賜教 2019.3.6

 

新聞全文與聯結

Saudi Arabia plans to include Chinese language in education curriculum
Saudi Gazette 2019-02-22 20:18:00

BEIJING — A plan to include Chinese language as a curriculum at all stages of education — in schools and universities — across the Kingdom was agreed upon during a meeting between Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman, deputy premier, minister of defense and a high-level Chinese delegation.
The proposal aims to strengthen friendship and cooperation between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the People’s Republic of China and to deepen the strategic partnership at all levels, Saudi Press Agency said on Friday.
The move seeks to forge a strategic partnership in order to achieve the aspirations of both Saudi and Chinese leaderships and to seize the promising opportunities between their peoples.
The inclusion of the Chinese language in Saudi schools and universities will enhance the cultural diversity of students in the Kingdom and contribute to the achievement of the future national goals in the field of education in line with the Kingdom’s Vision 2030.

Chinese language’s introduction into the Saudi curricula is an important step toward opening new academic horizons for students at the various educational levels in Saudi Arabia.
Learning Chinese language will serve as bridge between the peoples of the two countries that will contribute to promoting trade and cultural ties. – SPA

連結:http://saudigazette.com.sa/article/559758/SAUDI-ARABIA/Saudi-Arabia-plans-to-include-Chinese-language-in-education-curriculum?fbclid=IwAR1NVAmNhHA8N0XGqCDVOOcGD56DvMw_NcjSH-Asl7RuJT73HPDLfc0VKUM accessed March 5, 2019

53370858_2333663463331723_8825441186576596992_n.jpg

53020137_2333611853336884_9029090715933605888_n.jpg

53160315_2333608893337180_5438792957522083840_o.jpg

53316586_2333605336670869_1094352238182137856_o.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

一帶一路背後的大戰略

accessed March 11, 2019

魏城 Financial Times 2019/2/25

Financial Times連結:http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001081589?full=y&archive

南華早報聯結(內容同上)http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001081589?full=y&archive

10.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

倫敦政經學院演講

accessed March 11, 2019

在下於倫敦政經學院演講的場景、及內容。敬請賜教。
Dominating Eurasiafrica without War:
Beijing’s Grand Strategy behind Its Belt Road Initiative

Chong-Pin Lin
February 23, 2019

(A debate on the BRI: China’s debt-trap diplomacy or win-win cooperation? LSESU China Development Forum 2019
Embracing New Dynamics)

From 1949 to 1979, China waged six wars across its borders. From 1979 to 2019, the number of wars it waged beyond its borders is zero.
Why?
During the first 30 years, as China was poor, backward and struggling, it was prone to war-fighting. In the following 40 years, as China began to rise, it has become war-aversive. 
“War is an instrument of ill-omen, use it only when left with no choice.” So said Laozi, a Chinese sage in the sixth century before Christ. As China gradually becomes prosperous, war as a foreign policy option falls to the last priority.
In strong contrast to the West, Sun Zi -- the most influential Chinese strategist over more than two thousand years -- said, “ Winning without fighting is the optimal strategy.” In other words, in war or any form of contest, violence is best to be avoided. The underlying spirit is to seek the approach that encounters the least resistance. As a result, to achieve victory with minimum casualties and bloodshed is the most desirable.
Whereas, Karl von Clausewitz, the equivalent of Sunzi in the West, said “War is violence pushed to its utmost bounds.” In other words, in war, violence is maximized and unavoidable. Crushing the enemy with overwhelming force is the best, regardless of casualties and bloodshed.
Deeply rooted in Chinese strategic tradition, Beijing’s grand strategy in the 21st century is “dominating Europe, Asia and Africa or Eurasiafrica without war”. 
With what then

With extra-military instruments such as economy, diplomacy, and culture on the front, but supported by China’s rapidly advancing military capabilities as the backbone. The idea, seemingly self-contradictory, is reminiscent of Teddy Roosevelt’s adage, “Speak softly and carry a big stick, you will go far.”
“Extra-military” differs from “non-military” in that it transcends, but not excludes, the military. 
The purpose is to minimize resistance for Beijing to expand its geopolitical influence.
The decision for Beijing to go west first – over the World Island and Africa, --instead of east -– over the Pacific, -- also reflects choosing the route of the least resistance to avoid immediate confrontation with the U.S. and Japan.
In this context, Beijing’s Belt Road Initiative (BRI) visibly manifests its unsaid grand strategy.
There is no denying that the BRI has encountered resistance. In Southeast Asia, by late 2018, China had only 12 large investment projects left, down from 33 a year earlier. In Malaysia, for example, the re-elected Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has recently canceled the “East Coast Rail Link” project with China for fear of sinking into bankruptcy by incurring heavy debt.
However, in Europe and the Middle East, increasing number of harbors, airports, railway stations are now run and even owned by China in countries far from bordering on bankruptcy.
Israel’s largest international seaport Haifa as well as its second largest, Ashdod, will be owned by China for 25 years starting in 2021 as a result of China’s work on port expansions for Haifa and Ashdod that started in 2015. Israel’s average GDP growth over the last five years was more than three percent (3.52%) higher than that of the U.S. at slightly over two percent (2.12%).
It would be quite contrived to term the case above a debt-trap deal. A win-win cooperation looks more like it.
Greece was bankrupt in 2008. Its GDP grew at minus 9.1% in 2011. China arrived in 2008 with some $9 billion investment on infrastructure constructions. In 2014, Greek GDP grew 0.7%, first time above zero in six years. In 2005, Athens let China manage its largest seaport Piraeus. In 2016, China’s seafaring company COSCO bought Piraeus for 35 years. In 2017, Greece’s GDP grew positively at 1.4% up from minus 0.2% in 2016. And on 26 August 2017, Piraeus was rated by New York Times the busiest seaport in Europe. From 2010 to 2018, Piraeus shot up the rankings of the world’s busiest container port from the 93rd to 38th.
Is Greece a victim of China’s debt-trap diplomacy? Hardly.
In 2017, COSCO bought Zeebrugge port, the second largest in the Netherlands. In the same year, COSCO bought Valencia port, the largest in Spain.
Are the Netherlands and Spain yet other victims of China’s debt-trap diplomacy? Apparently not.
As China applies the BRI to the developed countries, the outcomes resemble more win-win cooperation than debt-trap diplomacy. On the other hand, as China’s BRI applied to the developing world, sad cases resembling debt-trap diplomacy have occurred.
Are the problematic cases the intended consequences of Beijing’s strategic design or the outcomes of Beijing’s shortsighted conception and faulty implementations? An unequivocal judgement one way or the other is difficult to reach without peeping into the black box of Zhongnanhai’s decision-making apparatus which obviously is infeasible.

If the BRI is Beijing’s conceived route to realize its “China Dream”, win-win cooperation rather than debt-trap diplomacy is the pragmatic policy option to pursue. It is because win-win cooperation reduces resistance and enhances the chances of success while debt-trap diplomacy only self-obstructs and pushes its China Dream ever further away from realization.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

7.jpg

8.jpg

9.jpg

11.jpg

10.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

弟子問佛

accessed Feb 18, 2019

弟子問佛:您既神通又慈悲,為何還有人受苦? 佛說:我雖有最大的神通力,但依然有四件事情是做不到的: 
第一,因果不可改:自因自果,别人是代替不了的;

第二,智慧不可賜:任何人要開智慧,離不開自身的磨練;

第三,妙法不可說:宇宙真相用語言講不明白,只能靠實證;

第四,無缘不能度:無缘之人,他是聽不進你的話的。天雨雖寬,不潤無根之草;佛門廣大,難度無缘之人。

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()