“Why 2018 was the best year ever”

Nicholas Kristof, New York Times January 9, 2019 pp.11

Accessed Jan 21 , 2019

-- 2018是人類歷史上最好的一年。
-- 世界的人口活得更常了,過得更好了。
-- 全球媒體都一樣,報導戰爭、殺戮、飢荒,但不聚焦於人類的進步。
-- 美國是例外,平均壽命下降。而全世界別處都在上升。

網站連結點此

50184517_2260958420602228_890429853847781376_o.jpg

The world is, as everyone knows, going to hell, but there’s still the nervous thrill of waiting to see precisely which dark force will take us down. Will the economy collapse first, the ice sheets melt first, or chaos and war envelop us first?

So here’s my antidote to that gloom: Let me try to make the case that 2018 was actually the best year in human history.

Each day on average, about another 295,000 people around the world gained access to electricity for the first time, according to Max Roser of Oxford University and his Our World in Data website. Every day, another 305,000 were able to access clean drinking water for the first time. And each day an additional 620,000 people were able to get online for the first time.

Never before has such a large portion of humanity been literate, enjoyed a middle-class cushion, lived such long lives, had access to family planning or been confident that their children would survive. Let’s hit pause on our fears and frustrations and share a nanosecond of celebration at this backdrop of progress.

 

On a dirt road in rural Angola a few years ago, I met a woman named Delfina Fernandes who had lost 10 children, out of 15; she had endured perhaps the greatest blow any parent can, and she had suffered it 10 times.

Yet such child deaths are becoming far less common. Only about 4 percent of children worldwide now die by the age of 5. That’s still horrifying, but it’s down from 19 percent in 1960 and 7 percent in 2003.

 

Indeed, children today in Mexico or Brazil are less likely to die by the age of 5 than American children were as recently as 1970.

The big news that won’t make a headline and won’t appear on television is that 15,000 children died around the world in the last 24 hours. But in the 1990s, it was 30,000 kids dying each day.

Perhaps it seems Pollyannish or tasteless to trumpet progress at a time when there is so much butchery, misrule and threat hanging over us. But I cover the butchery and misrule every other day of the year, and I do this annual column about progress to try to place those tragedies in perspective.

 

One reason for this column is that journalism is supposed to inform people about the world, and it turns out that most Americans (and citizens of other countries, too) are spectacularly misinformed.

For example, nine out of 10 Americans say in polls that global poverty is worsening or staying the same, when in fact the most important trend in the world is arguably a huge reduction in poverty. Until about the 1950s, a majority of humans had always lived in “extreme poverty,” defined as less than about $2 a person per day. When I was a university student in the early 1980s, 44 percent of the world’s population lived in extreme poverty.

Now, fewer than 10 percent of the world’s population lives in extreme poverty, as adjusted for inflation.

Likewise, Americans estimate that 35 percent of the world’s children have been vaccinated. In fact, 86 percent of all 1-year-olds have been vaccinated against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis.

“Everyone seems to get the world devastatingly wrong,” Dr. Hans Rosling, a brilliant scholar of international health, wrote in “Factfulness,” published in 2018, after his death. “Every group of people I ask thinks the world is more frightening, more violent and more hopeless — in short, more dramatic — than it really is.”

I suspect that this misperception reflects in part how we in journalism cover news. We cover wars, massacres and famines but are less focused on progress.

In the last year, I’ve covered atrocities against the Rohingya in Myanmar, starvation in Yemen, climate change in Bangladesh, refugees and child marriage at home, and some of the world’s worst poverty, in Central African Republic. All those stories deserve more attention, not less. But I never wrote columns or newsletters about three nations that registered astounding progress against authoritarianism and poor governance in 2018, Armenia, Ethiopia and Malaysia.

 

It is of course true that there are huge challenges ahead. The gains against global poverty and disease seem to be slowing, and climate change is an enormous threat to poor nations in particular. And the United States is an outlier, where life expectancy is falling, not rising as in most of the world. 

So there’s plenty to fret about. But a failure to acknowledge global progress can leave people feeling hopeless and ready to give up. In fact, the gains should show us what is possible and spur greater efforts to improve opportunity worldwide.

Every other day of the year, go ahead and gnash your teeth about President Trump or Nancy Pelosi, but take a break today (remember, just for a nanosecond!) to recognize that arguably the most important thing in the world now is not Trumpian bombast. Rather, it may be the way the world’s poorest and most desperate inhabitants are enjoying improved literacy and well-being, leading to a day when no mom will again lose 10 children.

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

“Hear the notes. See the notes. Be the notes.”

Corina Da Fonseca-Wollheim, New York Times January 19, 2019

Accessed Jan 21 , 2019

-- 結合古典音樂和靜坐開闢新的天地。
-- 普林斯頓大學宗教生活院地院長 Matthew Weiner 說:"佛教提倡的靜坐並不是指舌頭不動的安靜,而是淡化內心的活動,以除去阻礙我們如實的活在當下。"

 

50592056_2260986947266042_6044591905575010304_o.jpg

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the silences of the concert hall almost as much as the sounds. The expectant hush that falls on an auditorium when the oboe’s A pierces through the hum of voices and the lights dim. The way a spellbound audience can wrap a protective silence around a pianissimo ending. But on a recent afternoon in Richardson Auditorium at Princeton University here, silence became an equal partner to the music. I was in the hall for a series called Live Music Meditation. (The next event, on March 28, features the violinist Patricia Kopatchinskaja.) For the first 20 minutes, while listeners quietly filed in, I sat motionless with my eyes closed, noting the sounds of footsteps and the rustle of coats. Gradually, the calm deepened, broken now and then by a male voice inviting us to focus on our breath, relax our shoulders and clear our minds. From inside this stillness, the sound of a gong rang out like a bright explosion, followed by waves of amber overtones that seemed to dance with each other in space. Then more silence, long minutes of nothing to hear but the breathing of strangers. When the first notes of a clarinet threaded their way into my consciousness, they seemed to come from inside me. For the next half-hour, as a piano joined the clarinet, music wound its way through me as sound turned pure sensation. Eventually the last note settled back into silence. Then one more time the gong, followed by that male voice, sounding a little sheepish: “Some people would find it appropriate to clap now.” The applause, when it came, did seem out of place. And the performers, the clarinetist Martin Frost and the pianist Henrik Mawe, didn’t bow. In an onstage discussion after the unusual concert, they professed to being somewhat overwhelmed. “We were so aware of you listening to us so intensely that we started to listen to ourselves even more intensely, too,” Mr. Mawe said. An audience member told the musicians that, for him, “the most special thing was the silence before and after you played. There was anticipation without expectation.” The series, which is free to the public, was conceived by Dasha Koltunyuk, a pianist and a longtime member of a meditation group led by Matthew Weiner, a dean in the office of religious life at the university. By combining guided meditation with live music, she hoped to create a space in which, she said in a statement, “our tendency toward passivity or judgment while hearing music disperses into a pure, perceptive and receptive state of intense, present listening.” Composers have long played with silence. In the 20th century, they began to dissolve the border between scripted silence inside the music — the rests — and the ambient silence of a given acoustic space. Ligeti’s “Lux Aeterna” fades into seven bars of rest at the end. John Cage’s “4’33”” consists entirely of notated silence. These days, more presenters are experimenting with ways to make the audience aware of its role in creating the silence out of which music grows. When the artist Marina Abramovic presented the pianist Igor Levit in Bach’s “Goldberg” Variations at the Park Avenue Armory in 2015, listeners were relieved of their cellphones and outfitted with noise-dampening headphones that helped them sink into deep quiet for 30 minutes before the first notes of Bach. Concerts inside the Moab Music Festival’s red rock grotto in Utah begin with an invitation to take in the stillness of the natural setting. A twominute “celebration of silence” is at the center of Chatter in Albuquerque, N.M., and Gather NYC at SubCulture in Manhattan, both Sunday morning series combining classical music and storytelling. In a telephone interview, the violinist and conductor David Felberg, who runs Chatter, said that most audience members close their eyes for that period. “They’re either meditating or trying to listen to the sounds that exist naturally around them,” he said. “For us, it’s a bit of a palate cleanser. It’s almost like you’re fresh and ready to listen to the music.” Mr. Weiner, the Princeton dean, who led the guided meditation, said in an interview that he thinks of the quality created in the room not so much as silence but as sensitivity. In Buddhism, he said, that “doesn’t just mean verbal silence with your tongue. It means softening the constructions in your mind that get in the way of experiencing what’s in front of you.” As a critic normally tasked with shaping those constructions into written words, I was keenly aware of that softening. And as a diligent but novice meditator, I caught a glimpse, through the music, of what it means to let thoughts bubble up without engaging with them — through applause or judgment. Here was music not as a text to be read nor a recreational drug to be consumed for mood management, but as an audible process of coming into being and fading away. And, for a short while, listening turned into a state of pure receptivity: beginner’s ear.

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

林中斌我們還需要國防嗎

《財訊》200941

Accessed Jan 21 , 2019

以下為10年前在財訊登載的拙作"我們還需要國防嗎?"
最近整理文件時浮出。
當時為國民黨馬總統就職後第二年,
據財訊編輯說,這篇被網民瘋狂攻擊。
曾幾何時,當時情景已漸隨時間淡去。

但此文中,若干淺見今日回顧尚可博君一笑。
林中斌 2019.1.18

50510994_2264820346882702_1518059227313078272_o.jpg50104275_2264820366882700_8706807339388239872_o.jpg

50022343_2264820386882698_4096860082636062720_o.jpg

財訊20090401林中斌專欄(淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所教授)
我們還需要國防嗎?
面臨新情勢 建設新國防
字數:2202 口述:20090309 修訂:20090318

 

目前兩個問題困擾台灣國防。一、兩岸情勢趨緩,戰爭可能下降,為什麼台灣還需要建軍?二、全球金融風暴下,台灣經濟更不景氣,政府收入縮水,龐大國防經費仍佔政府支出首位,為十八%,遠在居次位的財政經費十%之上,為何不削減國防預算來救經濟?如何花得起大錢買昂貴的高科技武器?

其實,無論兩岸關係如何良好、經費如何拮据,台灣仍需要國防。理由有三:第一,國防是政經談判的後盾。沒有扎實的國防,談判桌上,會讓對方予取予求。而且,如果國防不足,人民對談判沒信心不支持。

第二,軍事實力確保和平。台灣即使成為中立國,仍需國防。中立國瑞士依賴堅實的國防,維持了五百年的和平。其國防也是軍力凶猛的以色列建軍的藍本。如果台灣有足夠的國防,會提高中共動武的代價,不讓中共內部好戰派振振有詞,也有助他們理性派佔上風。

第三,因應「非傳統安全」挑戰。近年來,全球天然和人為災害頻仍。雪災、森林火災、地震、火山爆發、海嘯、海盜劫船、恐怖攻擊、傳染病變多。包括中國在內的世界大國,都更重視發展「戰爭以外的軍事行動」能力,台灣如何能例外?台灣加強此種能力,可因應國內災變,也可參與國際救援。

我們面臨的是新的情勢,需要建設新國防。目前專一化人才訓練無法應付未來多樣化國防的挑戰。除了軍事、科技、管理以外,我們需要更多元化的軍人。人才培育的成本,遠低於購買高科技武器,而且發揮出的長期效益,遠高於高科技武器。

七年六月七日的解放軍報專文「軍事軟實力當論」指出「軍事軟實力與軍事硬實力密不可分,如影隨形,相得益彰…()從政治、經濟、外交、文化、軍事等多個層面進行建設」。最近國內提倡「軍事軟實力」,以及「上兵伐謀」(以謀略取勝為優先)的思維,雖然已慢一步,還不算太晚。我建議台灣朝三方向著手:

第一,多元化軍事教育。在先進超強的美軍,預備軍官佔總軍官人數三九%,佔四星上將十四%。美軍至今七百八十二位四星上將中,預備軍官有一六位。第一次波灣戰爭統帥、後來的國務卿包威爾(Colin Powell)便是其中之一。

對岸解放軍從九八年開始推動預備軍官制度(稱國防生)。當時參與民間大學僅兩所,到七年,增為一一六所。這些預備軍官,周末寒暑假受軍訓,其它時間與一般大學生無異,畢業後接受一年的軍事訓練,結訓後待遇與一般軍校畢業生全同。他們將佔二年新進軍官中的一半。這些軍官所具備的高科技專常、政治經濟知識、國際視野與語言能力,皆非傳統軍事教育能提供的。未來軍事需求將多元化,軍人要對軍隊外的社會事務,以及國家外的外交事務具敏銳度。最近我國防部宣布將恢復已終止的預備軍官制度是睿智的。

我應提升軍事外交能力。目前兩岸交流談判以經貿、旅遊、學術為主,但遲早將升高至軍事層面。關於軍事互信機制的談判無法由外交部、陸委會代表進行。必須由有備涉外經驗的軍人出面,研擬妥切務實的方案。

美軍許多將領有碩、博士學位。八年代美軍最高職位的參謀聯席會主席(相當於我參謀總長)科勞(William Crowe)上將就有博士學位。目前指揮伊拉克及阿富汗作戰的佩崔烏斯(David Petraeus)上將也是博士。共軍近年來大幅增加碩、博士軍官。比起美軍與共軍鼓勵在職軍人入研究所進修,國軍已落後。迎頭趕上應為台灣下一個國防建設的必要和重要決定。

解放軍正在提倡複合性指揮人才,也就是「軍政兼通、指揮與科技合一、熟悉國際政治經濟,甚至社會人文等方面全盤性思考的人才。」七年三月廿二日解放軍報裡,中國軍科院研究部部長姚有志將軍表示:「軍事人文素質決定一支軍隊的戰鬥力的高低,影響戰場對抗勝敗是打贏信息化〔即資訊化〕戰爭必然的要求」。表面上與軍事無關的人文素養,其實是新型態國防中的重要一環。相較之下,我軍尚無法接受軍人「人文素質」的觀念,其實已稍落後國軍以往所鄙夷的「土八路」。

第二方面,多元化將領晉升。在一九七年代,美國晉升一位幾乎沒帶過兵的海格(Alexander Haig)為四星上將,和一位出身士兵的四星上將魏塞(John Vessey)為參謀聯席會主席。八年十一月,美國甚至晉升了第一位女性四星上將鄧伍迪(Ann Dunwoody)。解放軍效法美軍,九八年解放軍晉升了未統御大部隊的曹剛川為上將,後昇國防部長。兩千年,解放軍晉升長於外交、收集情報與語言能力,但從未帶過兵的熊光楷為上將。

女人、預備軍官、士官,未帶兵的人,在國軍不可能晉升上將。國軍不妨打開視野,跟上時代:以洋為師,以敵為師。

第三,調整國防綱領。台灣未來的國防,經費有限,也需配合兩岸和緩政策,應採「戰略守勢,多重嚇阻」為指導綱領。宣稱「守勢戰略」,會令人質疑為何要獲取雄風飛彈等有戰術攻擊能力的武器。「戰略守勢」包括了「戰術攻勢」,比「守勢戰略」更彈性、更周全。一旦敵人開第一槍進犯,我當然要有戰術攻擊的能力。

「多重嚇阻」指的是同時獲取昂貴的高科技武器(先進艦艇、戰機、導彈),與便宜的低科技游擊戰及特種部隊裝備。高科技武器阻敵在先,是第一層嚇阻。低科技戰力是第二層嚇阻。類似伊拉克游擊隊對抗先進美軍的方式:在敵人進入國土後,以小部隊形式獨立作戰,以零星、局部的方式騷擾共軍,令其灰頭土臉無法結束戰爭。如果只依靠昂貴的第一層嚇阻,不止經費困難,戰略縱深也單薄。蛋都放在一個籃子裡,一旦不保,喪失一切。

目前國防指導綱領「防衛固守,有效嚇阻」方向正確,但文字尚可推敲。「防衛」及「固守」語意重疊,浪費寶貴的用字空間。「有效嚇阻」意味「無效嚇阻」的存在,語氣不夠堅定,與軍人說話算話、斬釘截鐵的精神不合。在新情勢下,檢討舊情勢下的指導綱領,時間已到。

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

林中斌 心靈:民主的救藥

《聯合報》2014417A17

Accessed Jan 21 , 2019

美國政府關門已28天,超過之前紀錄20天已一周多。何時恢復?遙遙無期。
今天重讀五年前所發表的拙見,頗有所感。
在此貼上敬請賜教。
林中斌 2019.1.17

《名人堂》心靈:民主的救藥

2014-04-17/聯合報/A17/民意論壇】
聯合知識庫-全文報紙資料庫

連結點此

49948975_2263519593679444_2086451535658614784_o.jpg

 

【林中斌】
民主一度是全世界夢寐以求的制度。人民安逸、社會自由、政府能幹、國家強盛,廿世紀的美國曾被認為是人間天堂。

今日美國,貧富極端化遠超過世界平均曲線,每天八個兒童死於槍枝暴力。但限制財富集中,或立法管制槍枝,政府無能為力。因為政黨惡鬥,政策癱瘓。

兩黨相互制衡,以防政策偏頗,是開國元勳精心設計的制度,而今導致兩黨僵持不下,政府寸步難行。

為何之前兩百年兩黨制衡運作良好,而今反成障礙?

「制衡制君子不制小人。」這是我曾教過的高材生林怡舟所答。

為何以前兩黨多君子,而今不然?

「榮譽感沒有了。」他答。

為何榮譽感以前有,現在沒有了?

美國不是有最好的民主制度,以及制度培養出的公民素質、法治社會嗎?難道都不管用了嗎?

顯然,之前美國民主運作良好的根源不是制度。

美國民主制度若沒有開國元勳高風亮節的精神充沛其中,只是空殼子,撐不起來。

華盛頓戰勝英軍,解散軍隊,拒稱帝,總統不多連任。第二任總統亞當斯和繼任者傑佛遜,皆為以國為重的君子,因政見不同成政敵,但卸任後恢復友誼。

這些高貴的精神後來為何流失了?

物質淹沒了心靈。

過去兩百年,科學快速發展,物質文明突飛猛進,影響社會價值。學術界,七年代達顛峰的「行為主義」便是典型。它重視外在行為和物質,蔑視內在心靈和道德。優點是追求客觀排斥主觀,提倡「價值中立」(value free),但演變到極端成為沒有對錯(value relativism)。教授甚至嘲笑探索道德是非的學生。廿世紀中期之後,政治學重視講權力的現實主義,嘲笑講理念的理想主義。其實歷史上成功的領袖無不兼顧現實與理想。

許多人認為:榮譽、道德是空的,是心中自我欺騙的幻影。實在的是金錢、權力、地位。

其實,物質和心靈應該並重。在今日的美國,甚至世界,物質掛帥。以前的美國,兩黨領袖為了國家整體利益,會妥協合作。廿多年前,共和黨總統雷根和民主黨眾院領袖歐尼爾就是範例。卅年前,大企業老闆,守護社會風氣,至少不好意思公開貪婪。這些行為今日難見。心靈物質失衡,道德淪亡,才是民主失序的根本病因。

一九九一年底,前蘇聯崩解,共產主義實驗七十多年後失敗了。曾經在六九年預言此結局的布里辛斯基(Zbigniew Brzezinski)教授接受訪問:「您過去預言實現了。您對將來的預言是什麼?」他曾主持卡特總統的國安會,任教哈佛及哥倫比亞大學,兼具學理背景和實務經驗。

「心靈主義將復興(the renaissance of spiritualism)。」他的回答令我吃驚。

他不是教宗,也不是達賴。他是國際關係學門,以現實主義訓練出來的學者和官員。現實主義講具體的「權力和利益」,卑視空泛的「理想和道德」。

他解釋:「因為共產主義的基礎是物質主義(唯物辯證法),它否定心靈的存在,說宗教是群眾的鴉片。它已經失敗了。而我們美國的資本主義何嘗不立足於物質主義?賺錢賺錢!其弊病已浮現。將來人類要尋找補救之路。」

透過長期教育的耕耘,恢復人類心靈和物質的平衡,將是未來的希望。近來嚴謹的科學證實心靈的存在,是有力的助因。一一年九月,首款腦波電視問世,一三年六月念力遙控飛機成功,都是事實。

(作者為前華府喬治城大學外交學院講座教授,曾任國防部副部長)

 

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

林中斌川普逆勢頓增 剋星華倫入場

《聯合報》2019115A15

Accessed Jan 21 , 2019

試簡述此短文寫作過程,敬請卓參。
-- 2019.1.3 ()下午開始找及讀資料
-- 2019.1.8 ()上午寄出稿件。1100字共花5天。週六例外 
未登山。
-- 2019.1.13()寄出二次修正稿。
-- 2019.1.15 () 稿件登出。從找資料至登出共12天。
-- 參考資料21件如下圖所示。
林中斌 2019.1.16

50096363_2260716150626455_4719430031871311872_o (1).jpg

49946669_2262041567160580_7135800730207649792_o.jpg

林中斌
聯合報名人堂 2019115A15
交最後修正稿日期:20190113 
本文字數:1099 
目標字數:1100

 

川普就任美國總統將屆兩年。雖爭議不斷,但無損其賴以當選及可能連任的民調支持度。自上月十六日至一月三日九次民調平均為四十二趴,與一六年十一月當選時數字同(Realclearpolitics)
然而近來不利他狀況密集爆發,為他原先看好的前景遮上烏雲。例如:
重臣離職:川普打破歷任總統紀錄,就任兩年內,撤換或流失六十五趴政府最重要的六十五位A團隊官員。最矚目的是備受尊重的國防部長馬提斯求去,至一月六日止,已帶動三位國防部高官辭職。原副總統幕僚長Nick Ayers,是川普上月下旬宣佈的新總統幕僚長,以接任被川普撤換的凱利上將。Ayers次日便公開回絕。 
眾院失守:原為川普共和黨掌控的眾議院,其主導權於十一月期中選舉為在野民主黨所奪。後者不同意川普撥款建美墨邊境圍牆,川普關閉聯邦政府以要脅。至一月十二日,已停擺廿二天,打破歷史紀錄。眾院有權發動彈劾總統,民主黨力尋把柄,不會放過。雖難達陣,但今後兩年將不斷纏擾川普。
通俄門進逼:川普一六年大選是否非法的獲得俄羅斯協助打擊對手希拉蕊?負責調查的美國司法部特別檢察官前FBI局長穆勒至今已獲得八位有關人士認罪,包括川普國安會顧問Michael Flynn,他的競選經理Paul Manafort,以及他的律師Michael CohenManafort下月將判刑,Cohen將赴國會作證。一旦至今仍保持緘默的穆勒發言,對川普威脅不可小覷。
基金會關門:「川普基金會」為川普設立由其子女經營。上月中,紐約法官起訴它諸多違法運作事件。它已關門,但是案子未了,是未爆彈。
經濟隱憂:上月,美國股市遭遇一九三一年來最大的十二月跌幅。美國歷史上第二長的經濟復甦在去年十月開始有減緩的跡象。十一月三日Economist雜誌稱川普減稅刺激經濟的效用已開始消退。十一月中,通用公司宣布關閉五個汽車廠。去年美國宣布破產農場共八十四家,高於金融海嘯之後高峰。一年多後若經濟明顯下滑,不利川普連任。
近幾月,滾滾而來的諸多逆勢雖尚未減損川普的支持度,但它們一旦發酵,情況難料。何況,上月底,清潔工的女兒,曾任哈佛大學教授的麻州參議員,伊莉莎白˙華倫宣佈代表民主黨投入大選。
相對於億萬富豪,靠父親錢財起家的川普,窮苦出身,單親媽媽,致力於打擊社會不公、保護弱勢族群的華倫,更能吸引川普的基本盤支持者¬¬。他們是金融危機之後,國家拯救大企業卻置失業又付不出房貸者於不顧的受害者,也是卅年來美國貧富不均超過其他西方國家的犧牲者。
華倫辯才無礙、魅力四射、形象清新正是惡言不斷、多方樹敵、弊案纏身川普的剋星。
一六年大選,華倫只為制度不公而大聲疾呼,從未參選大位。之後,被認為已出局。但敗選的民主黨黯淡無光,只反川普,而無建言。華倫不同,一向政綱明確,八年前曾落實成立消費者財務保護局。
放眼二年大選,川普聲勢或已臻頂。而華倫正蓄勢攀登美國首位女總統的高峰。

作者為前華府喬治大學外交學院講座教授,曾任國防部副部長

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Lily Marlene/Lili Marleen 莉莉瑪蓮

 Accessed Dec 24 , 2018

 

以下附上兩項 Youtube 音樂 以及 英文和德文的歌詞。

Below please find links to two Youtube pieces and both the Englsih and German lyrics

Outside the barracks, by the corner light

I'll always stand and wait for you at night

We will create a world for two

I'll wait for you the whole night through

For you, Lili Marlene

For you, Lili Marlene

Bugler tonight don't play the call to arms

I want another evening with her charms

Then we will say goodbye and part

I'll always keep you in my heart

With me, Lili Marlene

With me, Lili Marlene

Give me a rose to show how much you care

Tie to the stem a lock of golden hair

Surely tomorrow, you'll feel blue

But then will come a love that's new

For you, Lili Marlene

For you, Lili Marlene

When we are marching in the mud and cold

And when my pack seems more than I can hold

My love for you renews my might

I'm warm again, my pack is light

It's you, Lili Marlene

It's you, Lili Marlene

My love for you renews my might

I'm warm again, my pack is light

It's you, Lili Marlene

It's you, Lili Marlene

 

https://lyricstranslate.com/en/lili-marleen-lili-marlene.html?fbclid=IwAR0pa2RfVFSjuD4qx6wDOTSaR9Rm3oonMTdf0q0QzpGUA_KHGC-YW-VbqcU

 

Lied eines jungen Wachpostens (Lili Marleen)

 

1. Vor der Kaserne

Vor dem grossen Tor

Stand eine Laterne

Und steht sie noch davor

So woll'n wir uns da wieder seh'n

Bei der Laterne wollen wir steh'n

Wie einst Lili Marleen.

 

2. Unsere beide Schatten

Sah'n wie einer aus

Dass wir so lieb uns hatten

Das sah man gleich daraus

Und alle Leute soll'n es seh'n

Wenn wir bei der Laterne steh'n

Wie einst Lili Marleen.

 

3. Schon rief der Posten,

Sie blasen Zapfenstreich

Das kann drei Tage kosten

Kam'rad, ich komm sogleich

Da sagten wir auf Wiedersehen

Wie gerne wollt ich mit dir geh'n

Mit dir Lili Marleen.

 

4. Deine Schritte kennt sie,

Deinen zieren Gang

Alle Abend brennt sie,

Doch mich vergass sie lang

Und sollte mir ein Leids gescheh'n

Wer wird bei der Laterne stehen

Mit dir Lili Marleen?

 

5. Aus dem stillen Raume,

Aus der Erde Grund

Hebt mich wie im Traume

Dein verliebter Mund

Wenn sich die späten Nebel drehn

Werd' ich bei der Laterne steh'n

Wie einst Lili Marleen.

20181224 平安夜 渴求和平聲音 OK.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

"While China rose, a distracted America atrophied."

 Accessed Dec 24 , 2018

20181126China has won the Global war on terror Ok.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

浪跡山涯

Accessed Dec 24 , 2018

An old-time friend of mine from my days in Bowling Green, Ohio (1966-69) asked me where I went after Ohio. Was it Canada?

I could not help it but to post a few pictures of my days as a exploration geologist. From left to right:

Stillwater, Montana, 1974

Near Radium Hot Springs, British Columbia, 1970

Lillooet, Fraser Canyon, British Columbia 1970

49025902_2223907207640683_5442469874729222144_o.jpg

48420140_2223907490973988_8748305721424084992_o.jpg

48394543_2223907717640632_4536274226729975808_o.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

美國國防部長馬提斯辭職

Accessed Dec 24 , 2018

48383498_2223686724329398_1165296735610732544_o.jpg

Trump looks having passed the peak of his hitherto formidable momentum.

川普的勢頭看來過了峰頂。

--好幾件對他不利的事件再短期內密集爆發。骨牌崩塌效應開始發作。

--國防部長馬提斯辭職是最新和最傷川普的事件。

--川普原先安排的辦公室主任Nick Ayers公開拒絕其安排。

--川普自己司法部官員公開反對他 宣稱要介入引渡華為公主以助他打對中國打貿易戰。

--其他還有通俄門調查已獲得四位認罪的川普左右。而民主當將主導眾議院,就是啟動彈劾機制之處。彈劾總統從未實現過,但將嚴重的損耗川普的權利和聲勢。

-- Nick Ayers rejected the offer to be his Chief of Staff.

-- Trump's own official in the Attorney General's office publicly objected his comment to intervene on the "Huawei Princess" issue.

-- Special Prosecutor Mueller has obtained four of Trump's associates to admit guilty and to cooperate with the Russian gate investigation.As the Democrats will control the House and very likely initiate the impeachment process which may not come to fruition but will severely constrain Trump' power.

 

Chong-Pin Lin December 21, 2018

48424254_2223686740996063_5299912333852672_o.jpg

48424229_2223686787662725_5966402313714139136_n.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

林中斌 "老布希的平反"

《聯合報》 20181218,A13

Accessed Dec 24 , 2018

48429769_2219850511379686_8927561734915358720_o.jpg

林中斌

聯合報名人堂 20181218

交稿日期:20181212 本文字數:1100 目標字數:1100

 

美國第四十一位總統老布希於十一月底過世,享年九十四。

在位時被嘲笑為「窩囊廢」(wimp)的老布希,突然廣泛被人深切懷念。他一九八九年就職演說裡呼籲大家要對彼此"更仁慈,更溫柔",被認為陳腔濫調無病呻吟。但是如今回想,卻令人心疼不捨。為何如此?感謝兩位後繼總統的強烈對照。

小布希總統二○○三年貿然發動中東戰爭長年陷美國於傷亡與國債不斷攀昇的泥淖。他的莽撞短見凸顯當時被認為優柔遲鈍的老布希其實是睿智熟慮。九一年,老布希打侵占科威特的伊拉克。他備戰緩慢被名嘴Larry King揶揄。他速戰速決,並立刻撤兵,被國人批評懦弱。

一七年,就任總統的川普,翻天覆地令國內和世界喘喘不安。他好鬥寡情凸顯當時被認為拘謹乏趣的老布希其實是仁雅尚禮(grace)。老布希在華府數十年沒有樹敵。九二年他連任敗於柯林頓後,受挫很深,半隱居於海邊良久才恢復。但他離開白宮前不忘在辦公桌留下真摯手條鼓勵新主人:「…勿因批評者而沮喪,勿因他們改變你的路線。你現在的成功就是我們國家的成功。我堅定的支持你。」

兩千年,總統大選。小布希將出線,柯林頓做完八年將離任。記者訪問老布希,他夫人不免對柯林頓醜聞嚼舌兩句。老布希說:「不!不!不!」立刻制止。之後,老布希還邀請柯林頓去海邊別墅作客而成為真正的好友。

老布希任總統四年之前,曾為雷根總統的副手八年。那段時間,筆者在華府求學、教書、做研究。感觸尤深。

講話帶了黏黏的鼻音,印象裡是婆婆媽媽的叨勞。嘴角朝上,招牌微笑。八字眉,略帶憂戚。比起陽光四射笑容燦爛的雷根總統,副總統老布希似乎幽暗許多。那是我第一個對老布希的印象。

他就任總統後,有一次在白宮對台灣僑領說明某項對台政策的突破。在轉角智庫上班的我也順便被邀。近距離的觀察改變了我先前的看法。面色紅潤精神抖擻的老布希雖具總統之尊卻不厭其煩的把成就歸功於一位後來抵台任職的P先生。而P當時的地位不過是國安會幕僚而已。原來老布希如此體恤和尊重手下。我開始對他改觀。

老布希出生豪門。父親是美國參議員、銀行家、數任總統幕後的造就者。他成長於美國大蕭條的歲月,卻在女傭與司機照顧下與之絕緣。他的母親一再訓誡不許人前自誇:「沒人喜歡聽你說我如何,喬治!

高中畢業前六個月,日本轟炸珍珠港。他迫不及待要入伍。三年後的九月,他執行轟炸任務駕機從航母起飛在日據小笠原群島上空遭高射炮擊中。二同僚當場斃命。他跳傘降落太平洋,漂流數小時後為潛艇所救。後因戰功獲勳。至今為止,還不提戰場英勇,他是最後一位規矩服兵役的美國總統。

一四年,老布希九十大壽。兩腿已不靈光的他,從六千英尺上空跳傘慶生。

他給孫女的信說:「作為總統,我相信為人服務才是成功的定義。我不求普立茲獎,或其他的榮譽。我已找到了快樂。」

 

作者為前華府喬治大學外交學院講座教授,曾任國防部副部長

48368110_2219851354712935_5139519550437457920_o.jpg

48369879_2219851361379601_1314117511330922496_o.jpg

48375886_2219851268046277_3608018183589462016_o.jpg

48395899_2219851308046273_2033788463446228992_o.jpg

48398680_2219851248046279_6962952150792011776_o.jpg

林中斌 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()